Thursday, October 29, 2009
Cash for Clunkers
This could be the dumbest economic policy in my lifetime. It might have prompted more sales in the summer of 2009. However, most of these sales were not to people who are buying an "extra" car. It just prompted them to move up their car purchase, or they were going to buy one anyway. Therefore, all of the people who purchased a vehicle likely would have purchased one anyway in the next year or two.
Further, this decreased the number of used cars in the market. That forced the price higher. Many individuals who we would think of as the "working poor" rely on "clunkers" for transportation. Making their life more difficult by raising the price of vehicles isn't good policy, if you care at all about the poor.
Oh, and for this policy, all we had to do was pay $24,000 per "clunker".
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Sowell's "The Housing Boom and Bust"
Earlier I posted book recommendations and I recommended books by Thomas Sowell. Currently I am reading Sowell's new book - "The Housing Boom and Bust" - and it is also great. Sowell is truly gifted at organizing relevant material in a concise and meaningful way.
It really gives a detailed explanation of all the factors that went into the boom - including some truly horrible government policies. Warning - It is tough to read this book without getting angry at elected officials of both parties.
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Listen to my radio interview
The show is 90 minutes - I come on at about minute 34 or so - and am on for the rest of the broadcast.
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NGI80ORB
Monday, September 21, 2009
I am quoted in an article
http://www.labusinessjournal.com/article.asp?aID=140749
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Tuesday, September 22nd
AM 1070 WKOK
The "On the Mark" program from 9:00-10:00 AM.
You can listen live online at http://www.wqkx.com/1070_WKOK/WKOK_HOME.htm
Thursday, June 18, 2009
What economics books should a non-economist read?
Some non-economics books I like and that have some academic value:
Thursday, June 4, 2009
Daily Item article on Employment in the Valley
Region's jobless rate improves
By Tricia Pursell
The Daily Item
June 02, 2009 06:36 am— Regional unemployment improved in April, but was still worse than the state and national averages, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry.
"We have been hurt very hard with manufacturing losses here," said Matthew Rousu, assistant professor of economics at Susquehanna University in Selinsgrove. "There are some sectors of the economy that haven't been hit as hard."
Snyder County's unemployment rate for April was 8.7 percent, an improvement from 9.1 percent in March -- a difference of 100 jobs.
In Northumberland County, the April rate was 9.6 percent, compared to 9.7 percent in March, and in Union County, the April rate was 8.8 percent compared to 9.4 percent in March.
Montour County bucked the trend. Its jobless rate got worse, going from 6.3 percent in March to 6.8 percent in April.
The state unemployment rate is 7.6 percent, and the national jobless rate is 8.6 percent.
April was the most recent month for which seasonally adjusted figures were available.
The seasonally adjusted rate, according to Scott Meckley, with the Center for Workforce Information & Analysis, is used to check trends without the typical factors of job gain and loss at certain times of the year, such as construction declining in the winter and retail employment spiking over the holidays.
The unemployment rate numbers are not going to fluctuate too dramatically, Rousu said. They are numbers that move slowly beyond the overall economic condition of the nation. Little by little, the rates may drop, but "there are some areas that are still going to experience pain," he said.
A survey of economists that was published last week showed they all thought the recession would be over within nine months, Rousu said.
"Some are even thinking it's over," he said. "However, the unemployment rate is a lagging indicator. Even when the economy gets better, the unemployment rate is not going to improve as quickly as the economy improves.
"The reason is likely because employers err on the side of caution. "Firms are just trying to survive," he said. "It takes longer to catch up once the economy recovers."
When the most recent recession ended in 2001, the highest unemployment rate did not come until the middle of 2003, Rousu said.